Was Art Really the “Book of the Illiterate”?
Identifieur interne : 000486 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000485; suivant : 000487Was Art Really the “Book of the Illiterate”?
Auteurs : Lawrence G. DugganSource :
Abstract
Relations between images and texts have benefited from an increase in scholarly attention. In medieval studies, art historians, historians, codicologists, philologists and others have applied their methods to the study of illuminated manuscripts and other works of art. These studies have shifted from a concern about the contents of the messages contained in the artefacts (e.g. in iconography) to an interest in the ways in which they were communicated to their intended audiences. The perception of texts and images, their reception by contemporaries and by later generations have become topics in their own right. According to some, medieval images may be ‘read’. According to others, the perception of images is fundamentally different from that of texts. The analysis of individual manuscripts and works of art remains the basis for any consideration of their transmission and uses. The interactions between non-verbal and verbal forms of communication, more in particular the relations between visual symbols other than writing and the recording of speech in writing, are important for the evaluation of both images and texts.
Url:
DOI: 10.1484/M.USML-EB.3.4325
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000988
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000948
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000388
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000489
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000486
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Was Art Really the “Book of the Illiterate”?</title><author><name sortKey="Duggan, Lawrence G" sort="Duggan, Lawrence G" uniqKey="Duggan L" first="Lawrence G." last="Duggan">Lawrence G. Duggan</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DF9702210460E585572C1767103D6877507ADD51</idno><date when="2005" year="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1484/M.USML-EB.3.4325</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/8QZ-V07VRS7K-P/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000988</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000988</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000948</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000388</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000388</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000489</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000486</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000486</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Was Art Really the “Book of the Illiterate”?</title><author><name sortKey="Duggan, Lawrence G" sort="Duggan, Lawrence G" uniqKey="Duggan L" first="Lawrence G." last="Duggan">Lawrence G. Duggan</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Relations between images and texts have benefited from an increase in scholarly attention. In medieval studies, art historians, historians, codicologists, philologists and others have applied their methods to the study of illuminated manuscripts and other works of art. These studies have shifted from a concern about the contents of the messages contained in the artefacts (e.g. in iconography) to an interest in the ways in which they were communicated to their intended audiences. The perception of texts and images, their reception by contemporaries and by later generations have become topics in their own right. According to some, medieval images may be ‘read’. According to others, the perception of images is fundamentally different from that of texts. The analysis of individual manuscripts and works of art remains the basis for any consideration of their transmission and uses. The interactions between non-verbal and verbal forms of communication, more in particular the relations between visual symbols other than writing and the recording of speech in writing, are important for the evaluation of both images and texts.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Duggan, Lawrence G" sort="Duggan, Lawrence G" uniqKey="Duggan L" first="Lawrence G." last="Duggan">Lawrence G. Duggan</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Europe/France/explor/NotreDameDeParisV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000486 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000486 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Europe/France
|area= NotreDameDeParisV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:DF9702210460E585572C1767103D6877507ADD51
|texte= Was Art Really the “Book of the Illiterate”?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |